PayPal Order Form

1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(1-2):1-11
Experimentation with the "Fire-Hardening" of Wood
Stephen G. Warfel
This paper presents the methods and results of experimentation with the "fire-hardening" of wood. Thirty digging stick replicas made from deciduous and coniferous wood species were variously heat treated and subjected to both hardness and abrasion tests. Standard hardness testing proved all samples to be adversely effected by exposure to fire, while tests of wear or abrasion produced contrary results. Explanations of the experiment's outcome are provided in terms of physical, chemical, and mechanical wood science.
 
1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(1-2):12-20
A Dated Brewerton Component In Armstrong County, Pennsylvania
Richard L. George and Christine E. Davis
A 1980 test excavation of the multi-component Brown site, 36AR188, Armstrong County, Pennsylvania, isolated a 50 cm thick Brewerton component stratum with significant typological considerations. A 4140 B. C. C-14 date for a feature containing two Brewerton Side Notched points is indicative of longevity for the type in the Upper Ohio Valley based on comparisons with dated components from other sites. A local variant of the type that is recognizable by an acute tip is described and functionally analyzed.
 
1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(1-2):29-36
Fort Ancient and the Persistence of Blade-Core Industries
James A. Robertson
It has been suggested recently that a formal blade-core industry was an integral part of Fort Ancient lithic technology. Further, it was suggested that this technology was ultimately derived from Hopewell antecedents. Careful examination of the data used to support this hypothesis is found to be lacking. A consideration of the chipped stone assemblages from various Fort Ancient and Late Woodland sites suggests that formal blade-core industries are lacking in them and that the disappearance of the Hopewell blade-core industry was as sudden as its appearance.
 
1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(1-2):37-41
Function of the Perkiomen Broad Point: Another Point of View
F. Dayton Staats
Since the first description, more than 30 years ago, the Perkiomen Broad point has been considered a projectile point type. Recently, this assumption has been challenged (Pennsylvania Archaeologist 54, (3,4)). A new theory suggests that the Perkiomen was a heavy-duty cutting implement, a knife/cleaver. This article is a rebuttal to the latter supposition.
 
1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(1-2):42-51
An Assessment of Contract Archaeological Research in Southeastern Pennsylvania, 1975-1985
Jay F. Custer
All contract archaeological reports on projects from southeastern Pennsylvania submitted to the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission between 1975 and 1985 were reviewed as part of a Pennsylvania Archaeological Council project to assess the state of contract archaeology in the state. Many of the reports have serious deficiencies, such as poor or nonexistent research designs, inadequate regional overviews, and no problem orientation. Nonetheless, many of the reports are quite good and contract archaeology has furthered our knowledge of the historic and prehistoric past in southeastern Pennsylvania.
 

1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(3-4):1-21
Archaeological Investigation of the Crawford-Grist Site #2 (36FA262): An Early Woodland Hamlet
Denise L. Grantz

The Crawford-Grist Site (36FA262) represents an Early Wood­ land, possibly Adena, habitation locus occupying a topo­ graphic bench and saddle overlooking the Monongahela River valley in southwestern Pennsylvania. Test excavations resulting from a cultural resource management study of a pro­ posed surface coal mine tract revealed the presence of cultural features associated with Adena ceramic wares and other Early Woodland diagnostics. Radiocarbon assays from two features temporally assigned the occupation to the fifth century B.C. The results of the excavation are discussed below, and comparisons are drawn with other known Early Woodland and Adena habitation sites in the Northeast, including several from southwestern Pennsylvania
 

1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(3-4):22-24
Archaeometric Analysis of Materials from the Lancaster County Park Site (36LA96)
Jay F. Custer, Janice H. Carlson and Keith R. Doms

Archaeometric analysis of selected artifacts from the Lancaster County Park site (36LA96) shows that a metal cross recovered from one of the Contact Period graves dating to the first quarter of the 18th century was manufactured from low grade pewter and may be of local origin. A series of brass bracelets and preserved fabric are typical of fur trader goods available during this time period.
 

1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(3-4):25-34
Salvage of the Gray Site, Warren County, New Jersey
F. Dayton Staats

This paper presents information on salvage archaeology at a small, Late Woodland habitation site containing one house pattern, a burial, and a number of pit features. Charcoal found in association with classic Overpeck Incised pottery has been dated to A.D. 1260. There is also evidence of prior Middle Woodland activity; specifically two early coil constructed pots and a cache of 246 bifaces.
 

1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(3-4):35-38
A Clemson's Island Vessel from Bedford County, Pennsylvania
Richard L. George

A complete Clemson's Island ceramic vessel found in an unidentified Bedford County, Pennsylvania, rockshelter is described. The find is compared with other isolated occurrences of single vessels in rockshelters and other rocky hide­aways in Pennsylvania and New York. Brief typological com­ parisons are made with Clemson's Island pottery from nearby sites.
 

1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(3-4):39-47
Analysis of Paleo Indian Components from 36LA336, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Glen R. Smoker and Jay F. Custer

Two fluted projectile point fragments, one of which is the base of a Clovis point, have been recovered from surface collections at 36LA336. The environmental setting of the site is a swampy floodplain of a low order stream. One large early stage biface fragment and a sample of unmodified flakes showed presence of blood residue. The limited range of tool types suggests a hunting/processing site, and the low incidence of highly retouched tools with multiple working edges indicates that groups using the site were not carefully husbanding lithic resources.
 

1986 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 56(3-4):48-49
CHAPTER CONTRIBUTIONS-Burial #6, Hartley Site (36GR23)
Jean 0. Zimmerman and James D. Randolph

Since 1981 members of the Paul R. Stewart Chapter #19, Society for Pennsylvania Archaeology, Inc. have been exca vating at the Hartley site (36GR23). Located in eastern Greene County, Pennsylvania, this multi-component Monongahela site covers approximately 1.6 ha (4 acres) of an upland bench . Springs to the east and west, water sources for the site occupants, drain into the upper Muddy Run watershed. The tributary then issues into the Monongahela River a short distance east. An unusual human burial, herein referred to as Burial #6, was discovered in 1985. The discovery and its contents are the topic of this brief report.
 
Previous Volume                                           Next Volume