PayPal Order Form

2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(1):1-29
Archaeological Investigations at 36FA368: Implications for the Study of Monogahela Settlement Patterns
Paul A. Raber

A number of recent studies have defined the seasonal hamlet as a Monongahela settlement type. Investigations at the Grays Landing site (36FA368) in Fayette County, Pennsylvania, yielded the most complete picture of such a hamlet currently available and provided data on the nature of subsistence and settlement there. Several occupations can be defined at 36FA368, most of them focused on the use of riverine resources primarily during the early spring. The relationship of these seasonal occupations to the better-known fortified upland and floodplain villages is examined and a revised model of Monongahela settlement is presented.
 

2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(1):30-53
The Ault Site (36LY120): A Multi-Compoment Site Including a Fortified Shenks Ferry Village
James P. Bressler

The Ault site (36LY120) was partially excavated by members of the North Central Chapter No. 8 of the SPA from 1993- 1996. The site showed evidence of several historic and prehistoric components, the most interesting of which was the remains of a Shenks Ferry fortified village. The nature of the Shenks Ferry village and its possible relationship to the preceding Clemsons Island/Owasco component is the primary focus of this report. This paper is a summary of a previously published report on the site (Bressler and Rockey 1997).
 

2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(1):54-74
Geochemical Analysis of Archaeological Ceramics in the Hocking Valley, Ohio
Paul E. Patton, Elliot M.Abrams, and Ann Corinne Freter

Forty-six excavated potsherds from nine different sites in Ohio's Hocking Valley were analyzed using x-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) in an attempt to identify clay sources and determine the functional and chronological role of temper. The study demonstrated that ( 1 ) all pottery in our sample was made from Hocking Valley clays, (2) clays were selected by potters based on proximity to the residential site and quality of the clays, (3) clay sources were used over many generations, and (4) the transition from grit tempered Baum to shell tempered Feurt ceramics increased the strength of the pots, making them better suited for maize seed storage. Within the context of a growing maize based economy, a shifting division of labor, and an expanding Late Woodland/Late Prehistoric Hocking Valley population that increasingly resided in the more expansive floodplains, potters changed the temper agent in their pots while maintaining the continuity of their clay sources.
 

2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(1):75-78
Artifacts
 

2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(2):2-8
In Memoriam: Richard L. George
An Index of Publications and Papers by Richard L. George
 

2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(2):9-32
Historical Archaeological Investigations at the Cromwel l Mill (36HU179), Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania
Scott D. Heberling

Archaeological data recovery studies at several early 19th century industrial sites near Orbisonia, Huntingdon County, examined the diffusion of industrial technology into rural central Pennsylvania and the adaptation of this technology to local landscape and environmental conditions. At the Cromwell Mill site, in operation from 1826 to circa 1910, the investigations revealed how the owners overcame chronic water supply problems and integrated the milling operation into a single dam and race complex that powered three separate industries. They embraced new technology that improved efficiency and made their enterprise more competitive and profitable, even while continuing to rely on water power as the principal power source into the 20th century.
 

2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(2):33-41
Analysis of Skeletal Remains from the Old Town Site (33HS02) , A Late Archaic Cemetery in Harrison County, Ohio
Paul W Sciulli, Samantha H. Blatt, and Nancy E. Tatarek

The Old Town Cemetery site (33HS02) is a Late Archaic cemetery dated to 2720±40 rcy B.P. The present analysis indicates that the Old Town population shared a number of general biocultural features in common with the western Ohio Late Archaic population. These features include aspects of mortuary behavior, a basic hunting-gathering diet, the magnitude of physiological stress, and general body size. The last three of these biocultural features are likely features shared by most lower Great Lakes and upper Ohio Valley Late Archaic populations but the shared mortuary behavior suggests some form of interaction or shared cultural ancestry between the Old Town and the western Ohio populations. Genetic similarities of Old Town individuals, estimated from the pattern of cranial metric variation, suggests that they represent a population related to but distinct from the western Ohio Late Archaic population and highly divergent from the central New York Frontenac Island population. Analysis of genetic similarities in the Late Archaic West Virginia Follansbee cemetery individuals is consistent with the results from Old Town and suggests that the upper Ohio Valley and adjacent areas (Unglaciated Allegheny Plateau) was home to a Late Archaic population genetically distinct from people to the east and west.
 
2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(2):42-58
Birdstones: A Continuing Enigma in North American Archaeology
Marshall Joseph Becker
This paper reviews the origins, distribution, and use of prehistoric "birdstones", with a focus on Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Birdstones are one of the least understood artifact types in North America, but commonly are associated with Late Archaic period cultures in areas south of the Great Lakes. Details of temporal origins and regional distributions remain to be explored.
 
2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(2):59-73
Faith, Science, and Native American Origins: A Pennsylvania Discussion
Jay F Custer
Native American and archaeological perspectives on the initial peopling of Pennsylvania were presented at a recent conference at the State Museum of Pennsylvania. This article presents a discussion of the varied perspectives. Archaeologists often assume the privilege of speaking with an authority based on their objective and scientific methods. However, significant biases are present and rarely recognized. Archaeologists can help to alleviate these biases by being more careful about the ways they use their data, and by seeking to gather information that can be used to test existing ideas about the first people to inhabit Pennsylvania.
 
2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(2):74-76
The Role of Avocational Archaeology in Pennsylvania
Brian L. Fritz
The current role of amateur and avocational archaeology is examined from an historical perspective and its relative importance to the advancement of professional archaeology is highlighted.
 

2009 Pennsylvania Archaeologist 79(2):77-78
Artifact

Previous Volume                                           Next Volume

 




.

 

 












.